State of Gujarat vs SANGITABEN DINESHBHAI SOLANKI — 518/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020008662026
Filing Number
518/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
518/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009250925
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANGITABEN DINESHBHAI SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused Sangitaben Dineshbhai Solanki guilty under Section 6(P)(A) of the relevant statute after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose a sentence less than the minimum, the court exercised leniency considering the accused's financial condition and appeal for mercy, sentencing her to a fine of Rs. 500 with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court also ordered destruction of the seized prohibited materials after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused Sangitaben Dineshbhai Solanki guilty under Section 6(P)(A) of the relevant statute after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose a sentence less than the minimum, the court exercised leniency considering the accused's financial condition and appeal for mercy, sentencing her to a fine of Rs. 500 with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court also ordered destruction of the seized prohibited materials after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts