NITESH DHIRAJLAL MANIYAR vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 187/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008652026

Filing Number

187/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITESH DHIRAJLAL MANIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 187/2026 The court granted petitioner Nitesh Dhirajlal Maniyar's application under BNSS Section 503, ordering the release of funds totaling ₹348,471 that were frozen in six different bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint involving unauthorized transfers from his account. The court found that since no FIR had been filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, no other party had claimed the funds, and the investigating officer recommended their return, the petitioner was entitled to recover the seized amount. The funds were directed to be deposited in a designated State Bank of India account and returned to the petitioner subject to conditions that he produce them if the court orders and return them if any other claimant proves legitimate title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 187/2026 The court granted petitioner Nitesh Dhirajlal Maniyar's application under BNSS Section 503, ordering the release of funds totaling ₹348,471 that were frozen in six different bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint involving unauthorized transfers from his account. The court found that since no FIR had been filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, no other party had claimed the funds, and the investigating officer recommended their return, the petitioner was entitled to recover the seized amount. The funds were directed to be deposited in a designated State Bank of India account and returned to the petitioner subject to conditions that he produce them if the court orders and return them if any other claimant proves legitimate title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case