NITESH DHIRAJLAL MANIYAR vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 187/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008652026
Filing Number
187/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITESH DHIRAJLAL MANIYAR
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 187/2026 The court granted petitioner Nitesh Dhirajlal Maniyar's application under BNSS Section 503, ordering the release of funds totaling ₹348,471 that were frozen in six different bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint involving unauthorized transfers from his account. The court found that since no FIR had been filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, no other party had claimed the funds, and the investigating officer recommended their return, the petitioner was entitled to recover the seized amount. The funds were directed to be deposited in a designated State Bank of India account and returned to the petitioner subject to conditions that he produce them if the court orders and return them if any other claimant proves legitimate title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 187/2026 The court granted petitioner Nitesh Dhirajlal Maniyar's application under BNSS Section 503, ordering the release of funds totaling ₹348,471 that were frozen in six different bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint involving unauthorized transfers from his account. The court found that since no FIR had been filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, no other party had claimed the funds, and the investigating officer recommended their return, the petitioner was entitled to recover the seized amount. The funds were directed to be deposited in a designated State Bank of India account and returned to the petitioner subject to conditions that he produce them if the court orders and return them if any other claimant proves legitimate title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts