NAVNIT KALABHAI RAVALIYA vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 186/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008632026

Case disposed

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

NAVNIT KALABHAI RAVALIYA

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 186/2026 Petitioner: Navnit Kalabhai Ravaliya Respondent: State of Gujarat Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gir-Somnath The court granted the petitioner's application under BNS Section 503, ordering the release of seized funds totaling ₹134,000 that were frozen in suspicious bank accounts following a cybercrime fraud complaint. The court found that no FIR was filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, no other claimants came forward, and police confirmed they had no objection to returning the funds. The court directed the bank to transfer the seized amounts to Bank of Baroda custody, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce the funds if court-ordered and that any legitimate claimant asserting rights would require the petitioner to return them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 186/2026 Petitioner: Navnit Kalabhai Ravaliya Respondent: State of Gujarat Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gir-Somnath The court granted the petitioner's application under BNS Section 503, ordering the release of seized funds totaling ₹134,000 that were frozen in suspicious bank accounts following a cybercrime fraud complaint. The court found that no FIR was filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, no other claimants came forward, and police confirmed they had no objection to returning the funds. The court directed the bank to transfer the seized amounts to Bank of Baroda custody, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce the funds if court-ordered and that any legitimate claimant asserting rights would require the petitioner to return them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case