State of Gujarat vs BALUBHAI RANABHAI RATHOD — 515/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008612026

Filing Number

515/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

515/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009250740

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALUBHAI RANABHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 515/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Balubhai Ranabhai Rathod The court found the accused Balubhai Ranabhai Rathod guilty under Section 67A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must justify sentences below the minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. If the fine remains unpaid, the accused must serve one day's simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 515/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 515/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Balubhai Ranabhai Rathod The court found the accused Balubhai Ranabhai Rathod guilty under Section 67A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must justify sentences below the minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. If the fine remains unpaid, the accused must serve one day's simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case