VEGDANI IMRAN ABBASBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 185/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008602026
Filing Number
185/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
185/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VEGDANI IMRAN ABBASBHAI
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 185/2026 Petitioner: Vegdani Imran Abbasbhai Respondent: State of Gujarat The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath granted the petitioner's application under BNS Section 503, ordering the release of frozen bank funds totaling ₹11,580 seized in a cyber fraud case. The court found that no FIR had been filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, and no other claimant had come forward, while the investigating officer recommended returning the funds to the petitioner. The seized amount was ordered to be transferred to a designated bank account, subject to conditions that the petitioner must produce the funds upon court order and return them if legitimate claimants emerge with valid claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 185/2026 Petitioner: Vegdani Imran Abbasbhai Respondent: State of Gujarat The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath granted the petitioner's application under BNS Section 503, ordering the release of frozen bank funds totaling ₹11,580 seized in a cyber fraud case. The court found that no FIR had been filed despite considerable time passing, no arrests were made, and no other claimant had come forward, while the investigating officer recommended returning the funds to the petitioner. The seized amount was ordered to be transferred to a designated bank account, subject to conditions that the petitioner must produce the funds upon court order and return them if legitimate claimants emerge with valid claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts