KATAKPARA DAXABEN JAYESHBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 184/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008592026

Filing Number

184/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KATAKPARA DAXABEN JAYESHBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 184/2026 Katakpara Daxaben Jayeshbhai v. State of Gujarat The petitioner sought return of ₹5,000 frozen in her HDFC Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court granted the application under BNS Section 503, ordering return of the seized amount to the petitioner's custody subject to conditions: production before the court when required, and return if any other person legitimately claims the funds. The court found no FIR filed, no arrests made, no competing claims despite significant time elapsed, and police recommendation for return, rendering the petitioner entitled to recover her funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 184/2026 Katakpara Daxaben Jayeshbhai v. State of Gujarat The petitioner sought return of ₹5,000 frozen in her HDFC Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court granted the application under BNS Section 503, ordering return of the seized amount to the petitioner's custody subject to conditions: production before the court when required, and return if any other person legitimately claims the funds. The court found no FIR filed, no arrests made, no competing claims despite significant time elapsed, and police recommendation for return, rendering the petitioner entitled to recover her funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case