KATAKPARA DAXABEN JAYESHBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 184/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008592026
Filing Number
184/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KATAKPARA DAXABEN JAYESHBHAI
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 184/2026 Katakpara Daxaben Jayeshbhai v. State of Gujarat The petitioner sought return of ₹5,000 frozen in her HDFC Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court granted the application under BNS Section 503, ordering return of the seized amount to the petitioner's custody subject to conditions: production before the court when required, and return if any other person legitimately claims the funds. The court found no FIR filed, no arrests made, no competing claims despite significant time elapsed, and police recommendation for return, rendering the petitioner entitled to recover her funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 184/2026 Katakpara Daxaben Jayeshbhai v. State of Gujarat The petitioner sought return of ₹5,000 frozen in her HDFC Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court granted the application under BNS Section 503, ordering return of the seized amount to the petitioner's custody subject to conditions: production before the court when required, and return if any other person legitimately claims the funds. The court found no FIR filed, no arrests made, no competing claims despite significant time elapsed, and police recommendation for return, rendering the petitioner entitled to recover her funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts