CHAVDA SURBHIN MAHESH vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 182/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008562026

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

182/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAVDA SURBHIN MAHESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 182/2026 Chavda Surbhin Mahesh v. State of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover Rs. 6,700 that was fraudulently transferred from her bank account in a cybercrime case. The investigating officer confirmed no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other party claimed the frozen funds. The court ordered the bank to release the amount to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond, subject to conditions that the funds remain available if other claimants emerge and that the petitioner produce them if the court directs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 182/2026 Chavda Surbhin Mahesh v. State of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover Rs. 6,700 that was fraudulently transferred from her bank account in a cybercrime case. The investigating officer confirmed no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other party claimed the frozen funds. The court ordered the bank to release the amount to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond, subject to conditions that the funds remain available if other claimants emerge and that the petitioner produce them if the court directs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case