CHAVDA SURBHIN MAHESH vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 182/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008562026

Case disposed

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

182/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

CHAVDA SURBHIN MAHESH

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 182/2026 Chavda Surbhin Mahesh v. State of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover Rs. 6,700 that was fraudulently transferred from her bank account in a cybercrime case. The investigating officer confirmed no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other party claimed the frozen funds. The court ordered the bank to release the amount to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond, subject to conditions that the funds remain available if other claimants emerge and that the petitioner produce them if the court directs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 182/2026 Chavda Surbhin Mahesh v. State of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover Rs. 6,700 that was fraudulently transferred from her bank account in a cybercrime case. The investigating officer confirmed no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other party claimed the frozen funds. The court ordered the bank to release the amount to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond, subject to conditions that the funds remain available if other claimants emerge and that the petitioner produce them if the court directs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case