VAIBHAVGIRI MANSUKHGIRI GAUSWAMI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 181/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008552026
Filing Number
181/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
181/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VAIBHAVGIRI MANSUKHGIRI GAUSWAMI
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 181/2026 The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to recover funds fraudulently transferred from his bank accounts in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner reported the incident to the cyber crime helpline, leading to seizure of approximately ₹51,647 across five suspect bank accounts; however, no FIR was filed and no arrests were made despite considerable time passing. The investigating officer supported the petitioner's claim, noting no other claimants had come forward. The court ordered the seized funds be returned to the petitioner upon furnishing bond, with instructions to consolidate the amounts into a Union Bank account and directed five banks to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 181/2026 The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to recover funds fraudulently transferred from his bank accounts in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner reported the incident to the cyber crime helpline, leading to seizure of approximately ₹51,647 across five suspect bank accounts; however, no FIR was filed and no arrests were made despite considerable time passing. The investigating officer supported the petitioner's claim, noting no other claimants had come forward. The court ordered the seized funds be returned to the petitioner upon furnishing bond, with instructions to consolidate the amounts into a Union Bank account and directed five banks to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts