VAIBHAVGIRI MANSUKHGIRI GAUSWAMI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 181/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008552026

Case disposed

Filing Number

181/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

181/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

VAIBHAVGIRI MANSUKHGIRI GAUSWAMI

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 181/2026 The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to recover funds fraudulently transferred from his bank accounts in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner reported the incident to the cyber crime helpline, leading to seizure of approximately ₹51,647 across five suspect bank accounts; however, no FIR was filed and no arrests were made despite considerable time passing. The investigating officer supported the petitioner's claim, noting no other claimants had come forward. The court ordered the seized funds be returned to the petitioner upon furnishing bond, with instructions to consolidate the amounts into a Union Bank account and directed five banks to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 181/2026 The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to recover funds fraudulently transferred from his bank accounts in a cyber fraud case. The petitioner reported the incident to the cyber crime helpline, leading to seizure of approximately ₹51,647 across five suspect bank accounts; however, no FIR was filed and no arrests were made despite considerable time passing. The investigating officer supported the petitioner's claim, noting no other claimants had come forward. The court ordered the seized funds be returned to the petitioner upon furnishing bond, with instructions to consolidate the amounts into a Union Bank account and directed five banks to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case