POONAM KANJIBHAI VAJA vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 180/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008542026
Filing Number
180/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
180/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
POONAM KANJIBHAI VAJA
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 180/2026 The court granted Poonam Kanjibhai Vaja's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), ordering the release of frozen funds totaling ₹104,375 seized in a cybercrime-related financial fraud case. The petitioner's bank account was frozen after money was fraudulently transferred to suspicious accounts following a cyber scam reported to helpline 1930, but no FIR was filed and no other claimant came forward. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover the funds and directed their transfer to a neutral account (City Union Bank) pending final investigation, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded by the court and return them if any legitimate claimant establishes prior rights to the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 180/2026 The court granted Poonam Kanjibhai Vaja's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), ordering the release of frozen funds totaling ₹104,375 seized in a cybercrime-related financial fraud case. The petitioner's bank account was frozen after money was fraudulently transferred to suspicious accounts following a cyber scam reported to helpline 1930, but no FIR was filed and no other claimant came forward. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover the funds and directed their transfer to a neutral account (City Union Bank) pending final investigation, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded by the court and return them if any legitimate claimant establishes prior rights to the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts