POONAM KANJIBHAI VAJA vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 180/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008542026

Case disposed

Filing Number

180/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

POONAM KANJIBHAI VAJA

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 180/2026 The court granted Poonam Kanjibhai Vaja's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), ordering the release of frozen funds totaling ₹104,375 seized in a cybercrime-related financial fraud case. The petitioner's bank account was frozen after money was fraudulently transferred to suspicious accounts following a cyber scam reported to helpline 1930, but no FIR was filed and no other claimant came forward. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover the funds and directed their transfer to a neutral account (City Union Bank) pending final investigation, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded by the court and return them if any legitimate claimant establishes prior rights to the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 180/2026 The court granted Poonam Kanjibhai Vaja's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), ordering the release of frozen funds totaling ₹104,375 seized in a cybercrime-related financial fraud case. The petitioner's bank account was frozen after money was fraudulently transferred to suspicious accounts following a cyber scam reported to helpline 1930, but no FIR was filed and no other claimant came forward. The court found the petitioner entitled to recover the funds and directed their transfer to a neutral account (City Union Bank) pending final investigation, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded by the court and return them if any legitimate claimant establishes prior rights to the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case