State of Gujarat vs BHAVESHBHAI DANABHAI BHAJGOTAR — 512/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008522026

Case disposed

Filing Number

512/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

512/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260225

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BHAVESHBHAI DANABHAI BHAJGOTAR

Hearing History

Judge: 15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found accused Bhaveshbhai Danabhai Bhajgotar guilty under BNS Section 170 (corresponding to former IPC Section 65A) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" justify sentences below statutory minimums, and considering the accused's financial condition and plea for leniency, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with time already served, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. Seized prohibited material was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found accused Bhaveshbhai Danabhai Bhajgotar guilty under BNS Section 170 (corresponding to former IPC Section 65A) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" justify sentences below statutory minimums, and considering the accused's financial condition and plea for leniency, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with time already served, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. Seized prohibited material was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case