State of Gujarat vs LAKHABHAI HAMIRBHAI VAGHELA — 369/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006712026

Filing Number

369/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

369/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004260101

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKHABHAI HAMIRBHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the accused Lakhabhai Hamirbhai Vagheла guilty under Section 67A of the IPC (prohibition-related offense) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying lenient sentencing principles based on special and adequate reasons, the court imposed a fine of ₹500 with imprisonment until rising of court, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, along with destruction of confiscated prohibited material post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 369/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused Lakhabhai Hamirbhai Vagheла guilty under Section 67A of the IPC (prohibition-related offense) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying lenient sentencing principles based on special and adequate reasons, the court imposed a fine of ₹500 with imprisonment until rising of court, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, along with destruction of confiscated prohibited material post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case