State of Gujarat vs GIRISHBHAI NARANBHAI RATHOD — 367/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006692026

Filing Number

367/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

367/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004260019

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRISHBHAI NARANBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Girishbhai Naranbhai Rathod guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B (now BNS Section 227) based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle from STATE OF GUJARAT v. NATWAR HARCHANDJI THAKOR that special and adequate reasons are required for sentencing below the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Girishbhai Naranbhai Rathod guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B (now BNS Section 227) based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle from STATE OF GUJARAT v. NATWAR HARCHANDJI THAKOR that special and adequate reasons are required for sentencing below the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case