State of Gujarat vs LAXMAN JESINGBHAI VAJA — 366/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006682026

Filing Number

366/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

366/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250900

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMAN JESINGBHAI VAJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the accused, Lakshman Jashingbhai Vaja, guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose sentences less than the minimum prescribed, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with simple imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's economic condition and reformation prospects. If the fine remains unpaid, the accused shall undergo one day's simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused, Lakshman Jashingbhai Vaja, guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose sentences less than the minimum prescribed, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with simple imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's economic condition and reformation prospects. If the fine remains unpaid, the accused shall undergo one day's simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case