State of Gujarat vs KARTIKBHAI SANDIPPURI GAUSWAMI — 364/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006662026

Filing Number

364/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

364/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250837

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTIKBHAI SANDIPPURI GAUSWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Kartikbhai Sandippuri Gaiswami, guilty of offenses under Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying lenient sentencing principles based on special circumstances and the accused's financial condition, the court imposed a fine of ₹100 under Prohibition Act and ₹1,000 under Motor Vehicles Act (total ₹1,100), with one day imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 364/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Kartikbhai Sandippuri Gaiswami, guilty of offenses under Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying lenient sentencing principles based on special circumstances and the accused's financial condition, the court imposed a fine of ₹100 under Prohibition Act and ₹1,000 under Motor Vehicles Act (total ₹1,100), with one day imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case