State of Gujarat vs HARSUKHBHAI MULABHAI CHANDPA — 362/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006642026

Filing Number

362/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

362/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004251013

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARSUKHBHAI MULABHAI CHANDPA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath found the accused, Harsukhbhai Mulabhhai Chandpa, guilty under Section 27 BNS (corresponding to former Section 6P) based on his voluntary confession. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine (or 1 day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's economic condition, guilty plea, and rehabilitative prospects, while ordering destruction of seized contraband after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath found the accused, Harsukhbhai Mulabhhai Chandpa, guilty under Section 27 BNS (corresponding to former Section 6P) based on his voluntary confession. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine (or 1 day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's economic condition, guilty plea, and rehabilitative prospects, while ordering destruction of seized contraband after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case