State of Gujarat vs BABIBEN W/O RAMSINGBHAI VASHRAMBHAI SOLANKI — 357/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006592026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

357/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

357/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250994

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BABIBEN W/O RAMSINGBHAI VASHRAMBHAI SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused Babiben guilty under Section 67A IPC (prohibition offense) after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lesser punishment, the court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹500 with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, and seized contraband material was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Babiben guilty under Section 67A IPC (prohibition offense) after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lesser punishment, the court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹500 with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, and seized contraband material was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case