State of Gujarat vs BABIBEN W/O RAMSINGBHAI VASHRAMBHAI SOLANKI — 357/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006592026

Filing Number

357/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

357/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250994

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABIBEN W/O RAMSINGBHAI VASHRAMBHAI SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Babiben guilty under Section 67A IPC (prohibition offense) after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lesser punishment, the court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹500 with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, and seized contraband material was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 357/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Babiben guilty under Section 67A IPC (prohibition offense) after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lesser punishment, the court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹500 with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, and seized contraband material was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case