State of Gujarat vs INUS URFE DINESH BHIKHANBHAI PARMAR MEER — 356/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020006582026
Filing Number
356/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
356/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186004250872
Police Station
PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.INUS URFE DINESH BHIKHANBHAI PARMAR MEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court found the accused Yunus (alias Dinesh) guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose lesser sentences, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time served, or 1 day simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 356/2026
The court found the accused Yunus (alias Dinesh) guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose lesser sentences, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time served, or 1 day simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts