MEGHNATHI VIBHUTIBEN PRATAPGIRI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 146/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020006532026

Filing Number

146/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

146/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEGHNATHI VIBHUTIBEN PRATAPGIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath approved the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS to recover funds frozen in their bank account following a cybercrime-related financial fraud. The court found that funds totaling approximately ₹6,174 were transferred to suspicious accounts and, after considering the investigating officer's opinion and the absence of any FIR or competing claims, ordered the release of the frozen amounts to the applicant on a personal bond subject to specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 146/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath approved the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS to recover funds frozen in their bank account following a cybercrime-related financial fraud. The court found that funds totaling approximately ₹6,174 were transferred to suspicious accounts and, after considering the investigating officer's opinion and the absence of any FIR or competing claims, ordered the release of the frozen amounts to the applicant on a personal bond subject to specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case