State of Gujarat vs JITENDRABHAI URFE JITUBHAI AALABHAI AKHIYA — 347/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006462026

Filing Number

347/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

347/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260179

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRABHAI URFE JITUBHAI AALABHAI AKHIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused Jitendrabhai guilty under BNS Section 137 read with Section 66(1)B and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment till the rising of court, imposing one day simple imprisonment as the alternative in case of non-payment. The court adopted a lenient approach citing the accused's voluntary confession, financial condition, and plea for mercy, applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lesser sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 347/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Jitendrabhai guilty under BNS Section 137 read with Section 66(1)B and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment till the rising of court, imposing one day simple imprisonment as the alternative in case of non-payment. The court adopted a lenient approach citing the accused's voluntary confession, financial condition, and plea for mercy, applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lesser sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case