State of Gujarat vs LAKHMANBHAI MERAMANBHAI CHAVDA — 346/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006452026

Filing Number

346/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

346/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250970

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKHMANBHAI MERAMANBHAI CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court found the accused Lakhmanbhai guilty under Section 67(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (prohibition offense) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lenient sentences, the court imposed a fine of ₹500 with imprisonment until court closure, or one day's simple imprisonment in default of payment. Seized contraband materials were ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused Lakhmanbhai guilty under Section 67(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (prohibition offense) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to impose lenient sentences, the court imposed a fine of ₹500 with imprisonment until court closure, or one day's simple imprisonment in default of payment. Seized contraband materials were ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case