State of Gujarat vs KISHANBHAI GORDHANBHAI SIDHHPURA — 345/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006442026

Filing Number

345/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

345/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250941

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.KISHANBHAI GORDHANBHAI SIDHHPURA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Kishnbhai Gordhanbhai Siddhpura for violations under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (Section 184) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)B), after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying lenient discretion based on the accused's financial condition and the principle that "special and adequate reasons" are required to impose less than minimum sentence, the court sentenced him to pay fines of ₹100 and ₹1,000 respectively (total ₹1,100), with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Kishnbhai Gordhanbhai Siddhpura for violations under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (Section 184) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)B), after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying lenient discretion based on the accused's financial condition and the principle that "special and adequate reasons" are required to impose less than minimum sentence, the court sentenced him to pay fines of ₹100 and ₹1,000 respectively (total ₹1,100), with simple imprisonment for one day as an alternative in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.