State of Gujarat vs SAHILBHAI ABBA HUSEN BHATI — 343/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020006422026

Filing Number

343/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

343/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260169

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHILBHAI ABBA HUSEN BHATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Shahilbhai Abbahusain Bhati under Section 66(1)(b) of the BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" are required to impose a sentence less than the minimum statutory punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time already served as imprisonment, considering the accused's economic condition and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Shahilbhai Abbahusain Bhati under Section 66(1)(b) of the BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" are required to impose a sentence less than the minimum statutory punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time already served as imprisonment, considering the accused's economic condition and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case