State of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI DAYABHAI SOLANKI — 321/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020006102026
Filing Number
321/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
321/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVINDBHAI DAYABHAI SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court found the accused, Govindabhai Dayabhai Solanki, guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine and imprisonment until court rising (or one day simple imprisonment if fine unpaid). The court adopted a rehabilitative approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 321/2026
The court found the accused, Govindabhai Dayabhai Solanki, guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine and imprisonment until court rising (or one day simple imprisonment if fine unpaid). The court adopted a rehabilitative approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts