State of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI VARJANGBHAI PARMAR — 312/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020006002026
Filing Number
312/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
312/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI VARJANGBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused, Maheshbhai Varjangbhai Parmar, guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B (a provisional offense section) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" justify lenient sentencing, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court rising, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 312/2026
The court found the accused, Maheshbhai Varjangbhai Parmar, guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B (a provisional offense section) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" justify lenient sentencing, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court rising, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts