State of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI RAJABHAI SEVARA — 309/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005972026

Filing Number

309/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

309/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDBHAI RAJABHAI SEVARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Govindblai Rajablai Sevra, guilty under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016 (Section 6-P) and imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine with imprisonment till the rising of the court, considering his voluntary confession and economic circumstances. The court ordered destruction of the seized prohibited material after the appeal period and adopted a reformative approach rather than awarding the statutory minimum sentence based on special and adequate reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 309/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Govindblai Rajablai Sevra, guilty under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016 (Section 6-P) and imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine with imprisonment till the rising of the court, considering his voluntary confession and economic circumstances. The court ordered destruction of the seized prohibited material after the appeal period and adopted a reformative approach rather than awarding the statutory minimum sentence based on special and adequate reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case