State of Gujarat vs MULJIBHAI CHINABHAI CHAVDA — 308/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005962026

Filing Number

308/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

308/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MULJIBHAI CHINABHAI CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused Muljibhai Chinabhai Chavda guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B (after his voluntary confession) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment till the court rises, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition, his plea for mercy, and the principle that special and adequate reasons must justify any deviation from the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 308/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Muljibhai Chinabhai Chavda guilty under IPC Section 66(1)B (after his voluntary confession) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment till the court rises, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition, his plea for mercy, and the principle that special and adequate reasons must justify any deviation from the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case