State of Gujarat vs KANTIBHAI PREMJIBHAI DALKI — 305/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005932026

Filing Number

305/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

305/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANTIBHAI PREMJIBHAI DALKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Kantibhai Premjibhai Dalkhi, guilty under BNS Section 67 (corresponding to old IPC Section 66(1)B) based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose lesser sentences, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time already served as imprisonment, considering the accused's economic condition and circumstances. In default of fine payment, the accused was sentenced to one day simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 305/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Kantibhai Premjibhai Dalkhi, guilty under BNS Section 67 (corresponding to old IPC Section 66(1)B) based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose lesser sentences, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time already served as imprisonment, considering the accused's economic condition and circumstances. In default of fine payment, the accused was sentenced to one day simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case