State of Gujarat vs PANKAJBHAI ARJANBHAI BHARDA — 303/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005912026

Filing Number

303/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

303/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJBHAI ARJANBHAI BHARDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath convicted accused Pankajbhai Arjanbhai Bharda under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Following the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of ₹100 fine with imprisonment till the rising of court, or one day's simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath convicted accused Pankajbhai Arjanbhai Bharda under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Following the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of ₹100 fine with imprisonment till the rising of court, or one day's simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case