State of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI RAJUBHAI VAYLU — 302/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005902026

Filing Number

302/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

302/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI RAJUBHAI VAYLU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Vijayabhai Rajubhai Vaylu, guilty under BNS Section 279 (corresponding to IPC Section 66(1)B) and imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 100 fine with time-served imprisonment, citing the accused's voluntary confession and personal circumstances. The court applied the principle established in Gujarat High Court precedent that sentences below the minimum require special and adequate reasons recorded in writing, and found such reasons present in this case to warrant reduced punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Vijayabhai Rajubhai Vaylu, guilty under BNS Section 279 (corresponding to IPC Section 66(1)B) and imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 100 fine with time-served imprisonment, citing the accused's voluntary confession and personal circumstances. The court applied the principle established in Gujarat High Court precedent that sentences below the minimum require special and adequate reasons recorded in writing, and found such reasons present in this case to warrant reduced punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case