State of Gujarat vs BHUPATBHAI LAKHMANBHAI VANVI — 301/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005892026

Filing Number

301/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUPATBHAI LAKHMANBHAI VANVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 279 (for the offense under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to award punishment less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with simple imprisonment until court rises, and one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, giving the accused an opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 301/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 279 (for the offense under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to award punishment less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with simple imprisonment until court rises, and one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, giving the accused an opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case