State of Gujarat vs BHUPATBHAI LAKHMANBHAI VANVI — 301/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020005892026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
301/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
301/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHUPATBHAI LAKHMANBHAI VANVI
Hearing History
Judge: 10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 279 (for the offense under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to award punishment less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with simple imprisonment until court rises, and one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, giving the accused an opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 279 (for the offense under Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist to award punishment less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with simple imprisonment until court rises, and one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, giving the accused an opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts