SOLANKI NITINBHAI BHAVESHBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 135/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020005882026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

135/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOLANKI NITINBHAI BHAVESHBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Gir Somnath Chief Judicial Magistrate granted the applicant's petition under BNSS Section 503, ordering the release of funds (totaling ₹6,155) that were frozen in suspicious bank accounts following a cybercrime-related financial fraud complaint. The court found that no FIR was filed, no arrests made, no other claimants came forward, and the investigating officer recommended returning the money to the applicant, making them the rightful custodian of the seized funds subject to specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gir Somnath Chief Judicial Magistrate granted the applicant's petition under BNSS Section 503, ordering the release of funds (totaling ₹6,155) that were frozen in suspicious bank accounts following a cybercrime-related financial fraud complaint. The court found that no FIR was filed, no arrests made, no other claimants came forward, and the investigating officer recommended returning the money to the applicant, making them the rightful custodian of the seized funds subject to specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case