HALAI M SHAHIL ASLAMBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 134/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020005872026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
134/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
134/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HALAI M SHAHIL ASLAMBHAI
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath granted the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to recover ₹10,000 that was frozen in a bank account following a cybercrime complaint. The court found that money had been fraudulently transferred from the applicant's account to a suspicious account, and since no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other claimant came forward, the applicant was entitled to recover the seized funds on furnishing bonds and subject to conditions that the amount be returned if legitimate claims arise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath granted the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to recover ₹10,000 that was frozen in a bank account following a cybercrime complaint. The court found that money had been fraudulently transferred from the applicant's account to a suspicious account, and since no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other claimant came forward, the applicant was entitled to recover the seized funds on furnishing bonds and subject to conditions that the amount be returned if legitimate claims arise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts