PAGDALA MURLI MOHAN vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 133/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020005862026

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

133/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAGDALA MURLI MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath granted the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), ordering the release of funds seized in a cybercrime fraud case. The court found that money fraudulently transferred from the applicant's bank account to multiple suspected accounts across 19 banks was frozen, and since no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other claimants came forward, the applicant was entitled to recover the seized amount. The court directed the funds be transferred to an HDFC Bank account and released upon submission of personal and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 133/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir Somnath granted the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), ordering the release of funds seized in a cybercrime fraud case. The court found that money fraudulently transferred from the applicant's bank account to multiple suspected accounts across 19 banks was frozen, and since no FIR was filed, no arrests were made, and no other claimants came forward, the applicant was entitled to recover the seized amount. The court directed the funds be transferred to an HDFC Bank account and released upon submission of personal and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case