State of Gujarat vs PARESH URFE VIKRAMBHAI HARIBHAI LODHARI — 300/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020005852026

Filing Number

300/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

300/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARESH URFE VIKRAMBHAI HARIBHAI LODHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused Paresh (Vikrambhai Haribhai Lodhariyu) guilty under BNS Section 277 read with Section 66(1)B and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment until court rising, or one day's simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court imposed a lenient sentence based on the accused's voluntary confession, poor financial condition, and plea for mercy, citing the need to provide reformation opportunities while upholding justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused Paresh (Vikrambhai Haribhai Lodhariyu) guilty under BNS Section 277 read with Section 66(1)B and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment until court rising, or one day's simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. The court imposed a lenient sentence based on the accused's voluntary confession, poor financial condition, and plea for mercy, citing the need to provide reformation opportunities while upholding justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case