NIDO HOME FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH Ms. DIVYA MUDALIAR vs SATARBHAI HUSHENBHAI MALEK — 109/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020004552026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIDO HOME FINANCE LIMITED THROUGH Ms. DIVYA MUDALIAR
Adv. R A KANSAGARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATARBHAI HUSHENBHAI MALEK
-
2.JARINA SATARBHAI MALEK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath allowed NIDO Home Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a residential property mortgaged by the borrowers. The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice and affidavit compliance, and authorized a court commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the financial institution within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2026
Order
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2026
Order
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2026
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath allowed NIDO Home Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a residential property mortgaged by the borrowers. The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice and affidavit compliance, and authorized a court commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the financial institution within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts