FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH AUTHO.OFFI.SALMAN PATEL vs DINESHBHAI NARANBHAI KUHADA — 95/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020003972026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
95/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH AUTHO.OFFI.SALMAN PATEL
Adv. M P KARIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DINESHBHAI NARANBHAI KUHADA
-
2.JAYSHRIBEN DINESHBHAI KUHADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath granted FedBank Financial Services Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a residential property mortgaged by borrower Dineshbhai Naranbhai Kuhada. The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements, including proper notice and classification of the account as non-performing, and authorized a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2026
Order
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2026
Order
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 95/2026
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Gir-Somnath granted FedBank Financial Services Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a residential property mortgaged by borrower Dineshbhai Naranbhai Kuhada. The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements, including proper notice and classification of the account as non-performing, and authorized a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts