State of Gujarat vs KALIDAS ODHAVJIBHAI AANJANI — 120/2026
Case under Gujarat Fisheries Act, 2003 Section 21(1)(E). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 30th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020002802026
Filing Number
120/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009260018
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KALIDAS ODHAVJIBHAI AANJANI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 06-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kalidas Odhavjibhai Aanjani (120/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Kalidas Odhavjibhai Aanjani for violating Rule 7(4) (as amended 2020) of the Gujarat Fisheries Regulations 2003 under Section 21(1) of the Gujarat Fisheries Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, assured this was his first offense, and requested mercy. The court, considering his voluntary confession, financial and social circumstances, and plea for rehabilitation, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine, with five days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kalidas Odhavjibhai Aanjani (120/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Kalidas Odhavjibhai Aanjani for violating Rule 7(4) (as amended 2020) of the Gujarat Fisheries Regulations 2003 under Section 21(1) of the Gujarat Fisheries Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, assured this was his first offense, and requested mercy. The court, considering his voluntary confession, financial and social circumstances, and plea for rehabilitation, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine, with five days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts