State of Gujarat vs JADAVBHAI KHIMJIBHAI KUHADA — 118/2026
Case under Gujarat Fisheries Act, 2003 Section 21(1)(E). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 30th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020002782026
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
118/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009260017
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JADAVBHAI KHIMJIBHAI KUHADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Jadavbhai Khimjibhai Kuhada (118/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Veraval, convicted the accused Jadavbhai Khimjibhai Kuhada under Rule 7(4) (as amended 2020), Section 21(1) of the Gujarat Fisheries Rules 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, assured the court this was his first offense and promised not to commit crimes in future. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹1,000 fine or 5 days simple imprisonment in the interest of justice, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial and social condition, and potential for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2026
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Jadavbhai Khimjibhai Kuhada (118/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Veraval, convicted the accused Jadavbhai Khimjibhai Kuhada under Rule 7(4) (as amended 2020), Section 21(1) of the Gujarat Fisheries Rules 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, assured the court this was his first offense and promised not to commit crimes in future. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹1,000 fine or 5 days simple imprisonment in the interest of justice, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial and social condition, and potential for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts