The State of Gujarat vs KASAM ABDULLAHBHAI DHOKI Advocate - D V BORICHANGAR — 39/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,302,324,504,506(2). Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJGS010024422022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
39/2022
Filing Date
19-09-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009220308
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. J D PATHAK
Respondent(s)
KASAM ABDULLAHBHAI DHOKI Advocate - D V BORICHANGAR
ISMAIL ABDULLAHBHAI DHOKI
Adv. P M DANGODARA
IMTIYAZ KASAM DHOKI
Adv. D V BORICHANGAR
SULEMANBHAI ABDULLAHBHAI DHOKI
Adv. P M DANGODARA
SHABBIR ABDULLAH DHOKI
Adv. P M DANGODARA
SAHIL SULEMAN DHOKI
Adv. P M DANGODARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 25-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 06-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 22-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 39/2022 The court ordered medical examination of the complainant at Veraval Civil Hospital with video documentation to verify whether the claimed medical condition (dizziness) is genuine or a false excuse to avoid trial testimony. If confirmed as genuine, the complainant should be excused from testifying; if false, the complainant may be directed to testify. The case was adjourned to 11/12/2024 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 39/2022 The court ordered medical examination of the complainant at Veraval Civil Hospital with video documentation to verify whether the claimed medical condition (dizziness) is genuine or a false excuse to avoid trial testimony. If confirmed as genuine, the complainant should be excused from testifying; if false, the complainant may be directed to testify. The case was adjourned to 11/12/2024 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts