Aakash Pradipbhai Thakrar vs Manishkumar Amrutlal Dharecha Advocate - A I SUMARA — 35/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Final Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Final Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJGS010023952022

Filing Number

35/2022

Filing Date

12-Sep-2022

Registration No

35/2022

Registration Date

12-Sep-2022

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aakash Pradipbhai Thakrar

    Adv. K.V.BORICHANGER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manishkumar Amrutlal Dharecha Advocate - A I SUMARA

  2. 2.Sanjaykumar Amrutlal Padhresha

    Adv. A I SUMARA

  3. 3.Kotak General Insurance

    Adv. P M HIRPARA

  4. 4.UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. V H KANJARIA

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 08-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 03-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 02-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 26-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 19-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 05-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 14-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 10-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 26-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 12-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 22-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 08-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 04-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  24. 13-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  25. 05-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  26. 30-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  27. 23-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  28. 16-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  29. 09-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  30. 02-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  31. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  32. 04-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  33. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  34. 13-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  35. 21-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  36. 17-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  37. 27-Dec-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  38. 22-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  39. 08-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  40. 11-Oct-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  41. 13-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  42. 09-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  43. 02-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  44. 12-Jul-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case 35/2022 Summary In this motor vehicle insurance dispute, the petitioner's vehicle was damaged in an accident and a claim was filed with Kotak General Insurance. The core dispute concerns the assessment of vehicle damage, with disagreement over the insurer's valuation. The tribunal ordered the insurance company's responsible officer to appear in person on 01/08/2024 and directed notice be sent to the company's nodal officer via official email and registered email ID. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  45. 12-Jul-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  46. 14-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  47. 10-May-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  48. 26-Apr-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  49. 29-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  50. 15-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  51. 01-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  52. 16-Feb-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  53. 02-Feb-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  54. 12-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  55. 22-Dec-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  56. 03-Nov-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  57. 06-Oct-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  58. 08-Sep-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  59. 04-Aug-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  60. 16-Jun-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  61. 28-Apr-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  62. 13-Apr-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  63. 17-Mar-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  64. 10-Feb-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  65. 27-Jan-2023

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  66. 23-Dec-2022

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  67. 05-Dec-2022

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  68. 03-Nov-2022

    Notice To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  69. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 12-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 35/2022 Summary In this motor vehicle insurance dispute, the petitioner's vehicle was damaged in an accident and a claim was filed with Kotak General Insurance. The core dispute concerns the assessment of vehicle damage, with disagreement over the insurer's valuation. The tribunal ordered the insurance company's responsible officer to appear in person on 01/08/2024 and directed notice be sent to the company's nodal officer via official email and registered email ID. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case