SHAILESHGIRI NARANGIRI APARNATHI vs RAJESHBHAI SHAMJIBHAI JETHWA BRANCH MANAGER OF SHRI KESHAV CO OP CREDIT SOC LTD Advocate - D V BORICHANGAR — 181/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS010015802025
Filing Number
181/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
181/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAILESHGIRI NARANGIRI APARNATHI
Adv. A I SUMARA
Respondent(s)
RAJESHBHAI SHAMJIBHAI JETHWA BRANCH MANAGER OF SHRI KESHAV CO OP CREDIT SOC LTD Advocate - D V BORICHANGAR
State of Gujarat
Adv. J D PATHAK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 181/2025 The appellant, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the trial court, filed this appeal against the conviction and sentence. However, both parties reached a settlement, which was recorded before the Permanent Lok Adalat on April 18, 2026. The court accepted the compromise as valid under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence against the appellant. No special costs were imposed on the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 181/2025 The appellant, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the trial court, filed this appeal against the conviction and sentence. However, both parties reached a settlement, which was recorded before the Permanent Lok Adalat on April 18, 2026. The court accepted the compromise as valid under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence against the appellant. No special costs were imposed on the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts