LAKHABHAI ARASIBHAI VAHDER vs RAMESHBHAI JETHABHAI VADHER Advocate - L K CHANDRANI — 22/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJGS010014352023

Filing Number

22/2023

Filing Date

30-Oct-2023

Registration No

22/2023

Registration Date

30-Oct-2023

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHABHAI ARASIBHAI VAHDER

    Adv. H V JETHVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI JETHABHAI VADHER Advocate - L K CHANDRANI

  2. 2.AMBUJA CEMENT COMPANY LTD

    Adv. M D JETHVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court decided two consolidated appeals challenging a trial court's decision in a property dispute. The Principal District Judge of Gir-Somnath affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff (Rameshbhai) is the legitimate son and sole heir of deceased Jethabhai Arshibhai, and therefore entitled to a 1/2 share in jointly-held agricultural land in Kukrash village. The court rejected the defendants' contentions that the plaintiff was not a legitimate heir, and declared the 2008 sale agreement between Defendant No. 1 (Lakhabhai, the plaintiff's uncle) and Defendant No. 2 (Ambuja Cement Ltd.) non-binding on the plaintiff, imposing a permanent injunction restraining any transfer until the plaintiff's share is partitioned and delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  13. 04-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  18. 04-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  20. 25-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  21. 30-May-2025

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  22. 08-May-2025

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  23. 11-Apr-2025

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  24. 04-Mar-2025

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  25. 28-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  26. 10-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  27. 17-Oct-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  28. 10-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  29. 10-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  30. 13-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  31. 13-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  32. 03-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  33. 03-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  34. 02-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  35. 02-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  36. 26-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  37. 26-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  38. 11-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  39. 11-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  40. 18-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  41. 18-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  42. 27-May-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  43. 27-May-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  44. 08-May-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  45. 08-May-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  46. 18-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  47. 02-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  48. 12-Mar-2024

    Judgement

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  49. 06-Mar-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  50. 22-Feb-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  51. 29-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  52. 04-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  53. 08-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  54. 10-Nov-2023

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl District Judge

  55. 30-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 30-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decided two consolidated appeals challenging a trial court's decision in a property dispute. The Principal District Judge of Gir-Somnath affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff (Rameshbhai) is the legitimate son and sole heir of deceased Jethabhai Arshibhai, and therefore entitled to a 1/2 share in jointly-held agricultural land in Kukrash village. The court rejected the defendants' contentions that the plaintiff was not a legitimate heir, and declared the 2008 sale agreement between Defendant No. 1 (Lakhabhai, the plaintiff's uncle) and Defendant No. 2 (Ambuja Cement Ltd.) non-binding on the plaintiff, imposing a permanent injunction restraining any transfer until the plaintiff's share is partitioned and delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case