LAKHABHAI ARASIBHAI VAHDER vs RAMESHBHAI JETHABHAI VADHER Advocate - L K CHANDRANI — 22/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS010014352023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
22/2023
Filing Date
30-10-2023
Registration No
22/2023
Registration Date
30-10-2023
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKHABHAI ARASIBHAI VAHDER
Adv. H V JETHVA
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI JETHABHAI VADHER Advocate - L K CHANDRANI
AMBUJA CEMENT COMPANY LTD
Adv. M D JETHVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court decided two consolidated appeals challenging a trial court's decision in a property dispute. The Principal District Judge of Gir-Somnath affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff (Rameshbhai) is the legitimate son and sole heir of deceased Jethabhai Arshibhai, and therefore entitled to a 1/2 share in jointly-held agricultural land in Kukrash village. The court rejected the defendants' contentions that the plaintiff was not a legitimate heir, and declared the 2008 sale agreement between Defendant No. 1 (Lakhabhai, the plaintiff's uncle) and Defendant No. 2 (Ambuja Cement Ltd.) non-binding on the plaintiff, imposing a permanent injunction restraining any transfer until the plaintiff's share is partitioned and delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court decided two consolidated appeals challenging a trial court's decision in a property dispute. The Principal District Judge of Gir-Somnath affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff (Rameshbhai) is the legitimate son and sole heir of deceased Jethabhai Arshibhai, and therefore entitled to a 1/2 share in jointly-held agricultural land in Kukrash village. The court rejected the defendants' contentions that the plaintiff was not a legitimate heir, and declared the 2008 sale agreement between Defendant No. 1 (Lakhabhai, the plaintiff's uncle) and Defendant No. 2 (Ambuja Cement Ltd.) non-binding on the plaintiff, imposing a permanent injunction restraining any transfer until the plaintiff's share is partitioned and delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts