State of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI SARMANBHAI VADHER Advocate - H N VALA — 45/2025

Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(D),(E),(F),(H),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 02nd April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJGS010013382025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

45/2025

Filing Date

29-10-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

29-10-2025

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

3012

Police Station

SOMNATH MARINE POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT, 1960 Section 11(D),(E),(F),(H),
THE GUJARAT ANIMAL PRESERVATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2017 Section 5,6(A),8,10,

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. J D PATHAK

Respondent(s)

VIJAYBHAI SARMANBHAI VADHER Advocate - H N VALA

SURAJBHAI DHIRUBHAI PARMAR

Adv. H N VALA

HARESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI PARMAR

Adv. H N VALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

02-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

21-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

28-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sessions Court of Gir-Somnath acquitted all three accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused were transporting two calves with intent to slaughter them illegally. The court held that critical witnesses (panch witnesses and independent witnesses) did not support the prosecution case, no veterinary evidence of cruelty was produced, and no proof of vehicle ownership or slaughter intent was established, thereby extending the benefit of doubt to the accused under Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Gir-Somnath acquitted all three accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused were transporting two calves with intent to slaughter them illegally. The court held that critical witnesses (panch witnesses and independent witnesses) did not support the prosecution case, no veterinary evidence of cruelty was produced, and no proof of vehicle ownership or slaughter intent was established, thereby extending the benefit of doubt to the accused under Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case