The State of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI NARANBHAI BARAD Advocate - H C CHAUHAN — 133/2023

Case under Mines and Minerals (development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 4(1)a,21,21(1)(2),22. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJGS010013092023

Case disposed

Filing Number

133/2023

Filing Date

27-09-2023

Registration No

133/2023

Registration Date

27-09-2023

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

3050

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT, 1957 Section 4(1)a,21,21(1)(2),22
THE GUJARAT MINERAL (PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL MINING, TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE) RULES, 2017 Section 3,5,6,13
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. K D VALA

Respondent(s)

GOVINDBHAI NARANBHAI BARAD Advocate - H C CHAUHAN

RAMESHBHAI SARMANBHAI MEVADA

LAKHMANBHAI VASABHAI KHUTAD

BIJALBHAI PACHABHAI KAMALIYA

VIJAYBHAI KALABHAI SOLANKI

PUNJABHAI KANABHAI CHHATRODIYA

VIRABHAI @ BILABHAI JIVABHAI SOLANKI

GOPALBHAI BHIKHABHAI SOLANKI

RAMABHAI MALABHAI SOLANKI

JESUKHBHAI VARJANGBHAI SOLANKI

AJITBHAI @ AJAYBHAI DEVSIBHAI BARAD

NARANBHAI KARSANBHAI SOLANKI

NAVINBHAI JAGMALBHAI @ JAGABHAI ZALA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

17-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: Sessions Case 133/2023 The court acquitted 13 of 14 accused persons charged with illegal limestone mining under Gujarat mineral regulations and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused engaged in unauthorized mining and mineral theft. Critically, the court held that the FIR was invalid because the complainant lacked authority to lodge the complaint, as mining offense cases require a written complaint from an authorized government officer under the Act's Section 22. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Sessions Case 133/2023 The court acquitted 13 of 14 accused persons charged with illegal limestone mining under Gujarat mineral regulations and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused engaged in unauthorized mining and mineral theft. Critically, the court held that the FIR was invalid because the complainant lacked authority to lodge the complaint, as mining offense cases require a written complaint from an authorized government officer under the Act's Section 22. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case