RAVINDRA KARSHANDAS DARI vs SANNI P. CHUDASMA — 46/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJGS010008622025
Filing Number
46/2025
Filing Date
11-Jul-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA KARSHANDAS DARI
Adv. Y L JOTVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANNI P. CHUDASMA
-
2.BAJAJ ALIANCE GEN. INSU. CO. LTD.
Adv. V S JETHAVA
-
3.PANKAJKUMAR JAYANTILAL PATHAK
-
4.ICICI LOMBARD GEN. INSU. CO. LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The M.A.C.T. (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) in Veraval disposed of M.A.C. Petition No. 46 of 2025 based on the applicant's compromise settlement with Opponent No. 2 and withdrawal of claims against Opponents 3 and 4. The court ordered issuance of a Court Fees Refund Certificate and an award as per rules, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2025
Summary The M.A.C.T. (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) in Veraval disposed of M.A.C. Petition No. 46 of 2025 based on the applicant's compromise settlement with Opponent No. 2 and withdrawal of claims against Opponents 3 and 4. The court ordered issuance of a Court Fees Refund Certificate and an award as per rules, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts