PGVCL vs RAFIKBHAI JUSABBHAI SAMA — 84/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS010007142025
Filing Number
84/2025
Filing Date
23-Jun-2025
Registration No
84/2025
Registration Date
23-Jun-2025
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL
Adv. K M ABHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAFIKBHAI JUSABBHAI SAMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: The Principal District Judge, Gir-Somnath allowed the appeal by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company against the trial court's dismissal of its civil suit for recovery of Rs. 85,740.42 for electricity theft charges. The court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain electricity-related recovery suits involving alleged theft, as such disputes fall outside Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which is handled by special courts. The trial judge's dismissal under CPC Order 7, Rule 11 was found erroneous and the matter was remanded for proper proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
For R&P
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2025
Summary: The Principal District Judge, Gir-Somnath allowed the appeal by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company against the trial court's dismissal of its civil suit for recovery of Rs. 85,740.42 for electricity theft charges. The court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain electricity-related recovery suits involving alleged theft, as such disputes fall outside Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which is handled by special courts. The trial judge's dismissal under CPC Order 7, Rule 11 was found erroneous and the matter was remanded for proper proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts