PGVCL vs SATISHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI TALAVIYA — 82/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJGS010006902025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

82/2025

Filing Date

17-06-2025

Registration No

82/2025

Registration Date

17-06-2025

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 96,

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL

Adv. K P RATHOD

Respondent(s)

SATISHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI TALAVIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

04-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

03-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court allowed the electricity company's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of its recovery suit. The appellate court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain electricity debt recovery cases involving alleged theft or unauthorized use, distinguishing such claims from cases falling under Section 126 (unauthorized use assessment) of the Electricity Act, 2003, which are handled administratively. The trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under CPC Order 7, Rule 11 without proper consideration, and the matter was remanded for proceedings on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the electricity company's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of its recovery suit. The appellate court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain electricity debt recovery cases involving alleged theft or unauthorized use, distinguishing such claims from cases falling under Section 126 (unauthorized use assessment) of the Electricity Act, 2003, which are handled administratively. The trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under CPC Order 7, Rule 11 without proper consideration, and the matter was remanded for proceedings on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case