PGVCL vs SATISHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI TALAVIYA — 82/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS010006902025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
17-06-2025
Registration No
82/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL
Adv. K P RATHOD
Respondent(s)
SATISHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI TALAVIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 04-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the electricity company's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of its recovery suit. The appellate court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain electricity debt recovery cases involving alleged theft or unauthorized use, distinguishing such claims from cases falling under Section 126 (unauthorized use assessment) of the Electricity Act, 2003, which are handled administratively. The trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under CPC Order 7, Rule 11 without proper consideration, and the matter was remanded for proceedings on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the electricity company's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of its recovery suit. The appellate court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain electricity debt recovery cases involving alleged theft or unauthorized use, distinguishing such claims from cases falling under Section 126 (unauthorized use assessment) of the Electricity Act, 2003, which are handled administratively. The trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under CPC Order 7, Rule 11 without proper consideration, and the matter was remanded for proceedings on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts