State of Gujarat vs AADIL URFE GANDHI AYUB CHAUHAN Advocate - A K CHAUHAN — 6/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75(1),76,351(2),333. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th May 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJGS010006412025
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
04-Jun-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
04-Jun-2025
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009250436
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat
Adv. K D VALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.AADIL URFE GANDHI AYUB CHAUHAN Advocate - A K CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 06/2025 Court: Special POCSO Court, Gir Somnath, Veraval Judge: J. J. Pandya Judgment Date: 06/05/2026 Court's Decision The Special Judge found the accused Aadil (also known as Gandhi) Ayub Chauhan (age 25) GUILTY of sexually abusing an 8-year-old girl and sentenced him to a maximum combined sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fines, along with compensation of ₹1,00,000 to the victim for rehabilitation and mental trauma, with 80% (₹80,000) deposited as fixed deposit until her adulthood. The conviction was based on the credible testimony of the minor victim, her parents, medical evidence, and CCTV footage showing the accused entering the complainant's apartment, which corroborated the allegation that the accused committed penetrative sexual assault and indecent acts against the child while making threats to ensure silence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
05-May-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
01-May-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
Case Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 06/2025 Court: Special POCSO Court, Gir Somnath, Veraval Judge: J. J. Pandya Judgment Date: 06/05/2026 Court's Decision The Special Judge found the accused Aadil (also known as Gandhi) Ayub Chauhan (age 25) GUILTY of sexually abusing an 8-year-old girl and sentenced him to a maximum combined sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fines, along with compensation of ₹1,00,000 to the victim for rehabilitation and mental trauma, with 80% (₹80,000) deposited as fixed deposit until her adulthood. The conviction was based on the credible testimony of the minor victim, her parents, medical evidence, and CCTV footage showing the accused entering the complainant's apartment, which corroborated the allegation that the accused committed penetrative sexual assault and indecent acts against the child while making threats to ensure silence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts