RAJESHKUMAR URFE RAJU GOVINDBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 120/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010003452026
Filing Number
120/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009250512
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESHKUMAR URFE RAJU GOVINDBHAI
Adv. D M VYAS
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
SERVICE OF PROCESS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SERVICE OF PROCESS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 120/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Court REJECTED the regular bail application filed by accused Rajeshkumar Urfe Raju Govindbhai under BNSS Section 483. The court found sufficient evidence of sexual abuse of a 6-year-old child, including medical examination reports from Civil Hospital corroborating the victim's testimony of genital trauma and abuse. Key Reasoning: Despite the investigating officer's incomplete evidence, the victim's detailed account of being shown obscene videos and sexually assaulted, corroborated by hospital medical records documenting injuries consistent with sexual abuse, established a prima facie case under POCSO Act Sections 7 and 8. The prosecution assured completion of remaining witness examinations, warranting denial of bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 120/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Court REJECTED the regular bail application filed by accused Rajeshkumar Urfe Raju Govindbhai under BNSS Section 483. The court found sufficient evidence of sexual abuse of a 6-year-old child, including medical examination reports from Civil Hospital corroborating the victim's testimony of genital trauma and abuse. Key Reasoning: Despite the investigating officer's incomplete evidence, the victim's detailed account of being shown obscene videos and sexually assaulted, corroborated by hospital medical records documenting injuries consistent with sexual abuse, established a prima facie case under POCSO Act Sections 7 and 8. The prosecution assured completion of remaining witness examinations, warranting denial of bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts