JAVIDBHAI ISHAKBHAI MUGAL vs State of Gujarat Advocate - J D PATHAK — 57/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 16th May 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS010003432026
Filing Number
57/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186005220178
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAVIDBHAI ISHAKBHAI MUGAL
Adv. A I SUMARA
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - J D PATHAK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
INTERIM HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 08-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 17-03-2026 | INTERIM HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 57/2026 Javidbhai Ishakbhai Mugal appealed his conviction under IPC Section 323 (causing hurt), where the trial court sentenced him to 6 months simple imprisonment, a ₹1,000 fine, and additional 3 months imprisonment if fine remained unpaid. However, both parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the appellate court accepted their compromise petition under BNSS Section 339(1). The court set aside the trial court's sentence, acquitted the appellant as innocent under BNSS Section 339(5), and ordered refund of the fine amount paid to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 57/2026 Javidbhai Ishakbhai Mugal appealed his conviction under IPC Section 323 (causing hurt), where the trial court sentenced him to 6 months simple imprisonment, a ₹1,000 fine, and additional 3 months imprisonment if fine remained unpaid. However, both parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the appellate court accepted their compromise petition under BNSS Section 339(1). The court set aside the trial court's sentence, acquitted the appellant as innocent under BNSS Section 339(5), and ordered refund of the fine amount paid to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts