JAVIDBHAI ISHAKBHAI MUGAL vs State of Gujarat Advocate - J D PATHAK — 57/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 16th May 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJGS010003432026

Case disposed

Filing Number

57/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

16th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186005220178

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A)
Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

JAVIDBHAI ISHAKBHAI MUGAL

Adv. A I SUMARA

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - J D PATHAK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

16-05-2026

Disposed

15-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

08-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

17-03-2026

INTERIM HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-05-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 57/2026 Javidbhai Ishakbhai Mugal appealed his conviction under IPC Section 323 (causing hurt), where the trial court sentenced him to 6 months simple imprisonment, a ₹1,000 fine, and additional 3 months imprisonment if fine remained unpaid. However, both parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the appellate court accepted their compromise petition under BNSS Section 339(1). The court set aside the trial court's sentence, acquitted the appellant as innocent under BNSS Section 339(5), and ordered refund of the fine amount paid to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 57/2026 Javidbhai Ishakbhai Mugal appealed his conviction under IPC Section 323 (causing hurt), where the trial court sentenced him to 6 months simple imprisonment, a ₹1,000 fine, and additional 3 months imprisonment if fine remained unpaid. However, both parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the appellate court accepted their compromise petition under BNSS Section 339(1). The court set aside the trial court's sentence, acquitted the appellant as innocent under BNSS Section 339(5), and ordered refund of the fine amount paid to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case